On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:24:18AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Great work! I am glad to see you got down with dia; I love that
> tool. Here are some comments:
Its cool that it exports to xfig as a way to use both tools.
>
> a. I am not sure what the "process realm" is.
ACK. renamed it.
> b. Developers do not tag bugs, they sign packages. Is that what you
> meant? Also, note that at the moment, most only sign source
> packages and binary uploads, not the binary packages themselves.
NACK. you lost me. this is a gap in my knowlege.
differentiate source package, binary upload, and binary package.
where do they go?
what do developers do?
who creates source package, binary uploads and binary pacakges?
> c. Upstream is not really a repository, is it?
ACK. changed it.
> d. I am missing the link between buildd and unstable. They get the
> orig.tar.gz from unstable for any uploads in incoming that do
> not include the tarball.
> e. I think it's "M. Schulze", not Shultze.
ACK.
> f. Sven's name has an Umlaut; here, to cut-n-paste: Müller
ACK. I still dont know how to fiddle with keymaps, input methods or such
things to get these!
> g. "users processes" should be "users' processes", though I think
> you may want to use another word. Like plain "users" or "user
> systems" may be better.
ACK.
> h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
> testing.
ACK. I'm not familar with all possibilities and also not sure how much
space it would take to include it. maybe a 'subprocess' box?
> i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control)
> without making it clear which one is meant.
NACK. I only used this word once in referense to high, medium, low
migration of packages from unstable to testing.
> j. "updates propagate", not "updates propagates". I know you are
> talking about the collection, but it sounds weird.
ACK.
>
> That's it for now.
>
> To get our graphs onto www.debian.org, I assume we file bugs against
> that pseudo-package.
there is an existing package that could include these? or to make an
ITP?
Someone in the 'eyecatcher' project said these may be helpful.
> Let me know when you are ready, then we can
> submit one bug report together.
>
Cool!
Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature