Re: Request for Help: apt 0.6
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Schulze <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005.02.14.1851 +0100]:
> > We need help by competent developers who work on apt 0.6 with the goal
> > to get it supported properly and eventually enter sid and sarge.
> Thank you, Joey!
> For the record, I am too strung up right now to be any use in
> coordinating this. However, I will help out.
> > - take into account that the archive key is rotated yearly
> Why? What argument is there against a per-release key, including
> keys for security, testing, unstable, and experimental? It would
> certainly make things a little easier...
See what I wrote in the line above the one you quoted:
| - design and discuss this with the release team
I didn't make this decision. It has been common practice on the
Debian archive for a number of years though.
There are pros and cons for using a yearly key and a key that lasts
for an entire release. However,
- if anything should be changed from the current situation, the
ftpmaster (and release team) need to be involved and
- if not a solution needs to be established to distribute the key
other than by aj sending a mail to debian-devel with the location
of the new key.
Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.