[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for Help: apt 0.6

also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> [2005.02.14.1933 +0100]:
> You still need to deal with key revocation and a new key being
> needed, anyway.  Yearly changes will not make it more difficult,
> it will make sure those codepaths are tested (and used at least
> once an year).

I am not sure a key needs to be revoked, it should just have an
expiry that forces us to release in time. :)

Do we have code paths for certificate management? In that case,
I wonder why it took so long this year...

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: