Re: list what's in the NEW queue?
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Ok. So maybe ftp-masters shouldn't accept NEW packages, but accept new
> binary packages (from existing source). This would allow me to close some
> "unfortunatelly" non-critical bugs, and improve overall sarge quality.
> I'm sure that I'm not the only one waiting for approval of splitted
> This way we're back to the NEW queue discussion and some automatic checks
> for packages which only incorporate new binary ones.
I thought about writing something like this myself. But I didn't,
because the logical answer would be "check out
http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak and start working", and I won't
be able to do that...
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich