Re: library packaging doc...
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:37:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> IIRC there were some people who objected to some of the contents of
> the document. But even for those it is probably better to have a
> Debian package - if it's important, the discussion will take place in
> bug reports, instead of not taking place.
I haven't read the document in question in a rather long time, so I
can't actually object (on some sort of serious basis, I mean), but I
would nevertheless request that the document be handed to the -english
mailing list for proofreading *before* it's uploaded as a package and
that a big "THIS IS A *GUIDE*" banner be stamped on it. The last thing
I want is people complaining that libfoo doesn't follow some chapter
and verse of said guide under the impression that it is somehow
"correct", "standard" or "mandatory".