Re: library packaging doc...
Junichi Uekawa <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Considering that enough people seem to be feeling the
> itch for libpkg-guide package, and since I would
> consider using the BTS etc. for revision management
> of libpkg-guide, I might go around packaging it as a
> Debian package.
> Any objections?
IIRC there were some people who objected to some of the contents of the
document. But even for those it is probably better to have a Debian
package - if it's important, the discussion will take place in bug
reports, instead of not taking place.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich