[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Do all frontends use the dpkg binary?

On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 18:19 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
> > > dpkg.
> > 
> > $ tail -1 /etc/apt/apt.conf
> > DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {"logger -t DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs";};
> I wonder if it would be possible to set is as default behaviour along with
> some logrotate scripts. Users quite often ask where are dpkg's actions
> logged so I think this would be good idea.
This would mean the disk would gradually fill up with logs, unless you
rotated them; which seems to defeat the use case everybody has given for
dpkg's actions being logged in the first place.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: