Martin Kittel writes, > Still, judging from everything I read so far, it seems that I am the only one > with such a strict view of dependency handling, so if nobody comes up with > support for my point of view, I will not add the dependency but go for the > debconf solution instead. For what it might be worth (IANADD), I would support Martin's point of view. > What's the use of package management if you don't go all the way? The question seems sensible. I would respectfully ask the same question. The existing kernel practice does seem to allow some room for improvement, at least in theory. Martin illustrates why. Does Martin not make a valid point?
Description: PGP signature