[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks? (Was: Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-3 for sarge)
To
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks? (Was: Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-3 for sarge)
From
: Anthony Towns <
aj@azure.humbug.org.au
>
Date
: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:52:01 +1000
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
41E814D1.4090600@azure.humbug.org.au
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
20050114124530.GA9664@wonderland.linux.it
>
References
: <20050114094838.GA28230@debianrules.debiancolombia.org> <
[🔎]
20050114124312.GT8765@A-Eskwadraat.nl
> <
[🔎]
20050114124530.GA9664@wonderland.linux.it
>
Marco d'Itri wrote:
I see no reason to complain.
*Woah*. Cheers, aj
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Anthony Towns (on-list)
Anthony Towns (off-list)
References
:
Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks? (Was: Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-3 for sarge)
From:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks? (Was: Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-3 for sarge)
From:
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Prev by Date:
Re: Is debhelper build-essential?
Next by Date:
Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks?
Previous by thread:
Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks? (Was: Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-3 for sarge)
Next by thread:
Re: Lintian-induced changes in changelog, hardlinks?
Index(es):
Date
Thread