Re: soname number in name of dev-package?

To: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 13 Jan 2005 09:09:23 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87acrdgssc.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050113132555.GB11074@henning.makholm.net>
References: <3lWch-5U4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWch-5U4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWch-5U4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWch-5U4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWch-5U4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWcg-5U4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <3lWYE-6CE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <[🔎] 873bx6s86c.fsf@83.73.128.1.ip.tele2adsl.dk> <[🔎] 87mzvez7lg.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <[🔎] 20050113024437.GZ10437@ns.snowman.net> <[🔎] 20050113132555.GB11074@henning.makholm.net>

Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:

> Is anybody advocating that we should try to "support unsupported
> versions of libraries"? I'm certainly not.

Sure!  That's what libc5 is.  

Thomas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

References:
- Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
  - From: Jens Peter Secher <jpsecher@get2net.dk>
- Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
  - From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
- Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

Prev by Date: Re: copyright vs. license
Next by Date: Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?
Previous by thread: Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
Next by thread: Re: soname number in name of dev-package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread