Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Subject: Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:17:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050110171704.GO21586@charite.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050110163714.GS19722@mails.so.argh.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050110031213.GA26885@alltel.net> <[🔎] 20050110162152.GA838@ba.issia.cnr.it> <[🔎] 20050110163245.GA1713@alltel.net> <[🔎] 20050110163714.GS19722@mails.so.argh.org>

* Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>:

> > The upstream is better.  It's already Debianized.  Do not use the one in 
> > the Debian archive.
> 
> I consider this as rude.

But it's true.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum)          Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin            Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin    Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-962
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF                 send no mail to spamtrap@charite.de

Reply to:

References:
- Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
  - From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>
- Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
  - From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>
- Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
  - From: William Ballard <nospam_40811@alltel.net>
- Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#289385: RFH: cdrtools -- searching co-maintainer for the package
Next by Date: Re: System snapshots
Previous by thread: Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
Next by thread: Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread