On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:50:43PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Kenneth Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org> [2004-03-03 00:19]: > > Hrm. Well, a check over the bug list does show that Moshe has not > > responded to any bugs since 14 May 2003. He hasn't been seen by > > db.debian.org at all recently. And, he's got unacknowledged NMUs for > > roughly half his packages. I guess that meets my definition of MIA. > > > > Anyone disagree? > > I agree in principle; he hasn't maintained his package well at all for > months, has admitted lack of time, but has not actually done anything > about it. However, he was on IRC just the other day so I'd rather > give him a chance to respond and give up some packages on his own > rathing than orphaning them for him. Martin, as I've mentioned in other replies to this thread, I really don't care what happens to the rest of Moshe's packages, other than Epydoc. If -qa wants to let him keep them, it doesn't bother me. If I don't have to be involved, that's even better - I've already spent too much effort dealing with Moshe up to this point. In any case, I wouldn't have even volunteered to orphan all of his packages if I hadn't mis-read the developer's reference, so I apologize for that. > Note that he's upstream for some of them (at least pms and zwm). In that case, perhaps it's not worth orphaning them. > BTW, my wnpp-orphan script takes Uploaders: into account > (http://cvs.debian.org/mia/?cvsroot=qa). Yep, I did find that, thanks. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgp4D5WtWsraz.pgp
Description: PGP signature