Il sab, 2004-02-28 alle 21:10, Marc Haber ha scritto: > The problem that I see is the following: From what I have understood > and tested, squid will not even ask the server addressed in the URL > for a later version if the object in the local cache is younger than > the max-age value given by the client. > > This means the following: If a client does apt-get update via a squid > at time x, and Debian issues a security update at time x+10m, all > clients using this squid instance and apt 0.5 will not get that > security update until x+86400s, which might be 86399 seconds too late. Unfortunately, this isn't even true. Please see bug #222499 on why squid doesn't even consider max-age if the request type is 'HEAD'. And at least apt-proxy does such requests. I must verify the kind of requests done by apt. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <luigi@debian.org> -- <gangitano@lugroma3.org> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata