On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:26:57PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:01:55PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote: > > You have to realise that requiring a translator to file bugs, followup > > on them, do an NMU (!) if necessary places a very high workload on > > them, and reduces the amount of people qualified to do it by a lot. > > The main advantage of my proposal would be to lessen the workload for > > the translators. > > Maybe if the BTS had a special tag for updated debconf translations, it > would be easier for translators (and other interested parties) to see > which updates are outstanding. The QA page could even list them as > candidates for NMUs or inactive or overloaded maintainers. A 'translation' tag has already been asked for, please see #114221. Feel free to comment in that bug report to convince the BTS admins. Regards Javi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature