[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: python again



On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:33:52 -0600, John Goerzen
<jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:06:38AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:44:37 -0600, John Goerzen
>> <jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote:
>> >If the module depends on python (>= 2.3), then /usr/bin/python is
>> >guaranteed to be 2.3 or above, and all scripts using that module can
>> >safely use /usr/bin/python.
>> 
>> but this means that we will have packages that are written in python,
>> but conflict with each other. This is decidedly bad, IMO.
>
>There's no conflict there.  I said (>= 2.3); any later version would
>fulfill that dependency.

But there are also packages that depend on python (<< 2.2), or
conflict with python (>> 2.2).

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29



Reply to: