Marc Haber wrote: > Why, oh why, does everybody insist using a language whose interpreter > is a bitch to backport, and whose minor versions are so subtletly > incompatible to each other that we need to have three versions of the > interpreter around. All of them, of course, interwoven with each other > in a way that makes it impossible to do careful backports, making it > necessary to backport all interpreter and all packages using it at a > time. Why should anyones incapability to produce backports keep anyone from using a very fine language? Kind regards Thomas
Attachment:
pgp9iCNSDJnW2.pgp
Description: PGP signature