Re: handling bugs of udev
* Nico Golde
| > If you read RTFM as «Fuck off and die, loser», rather than «Please,
| > this is documented in the obvious place. Go read the manual and then
| > come back if you still have any questions», then I think you need to
| > grow a thicker skin. RTFM is not an offensive reply, particularly not
| > to something which is clearly documented.
|
| yes you are right, but if i have a look on other replies on
| bugs by marco i think fuck off is his choice of words.
I beg to differ. He might not use the word «please» very often, but
I don't remember seeing any bug comments from him being very flamy.
| > It's not a bug, it's a configuration choice. You need to configure
| > your system if you're not happy with the default configuration.
| > Different packages have different default configurations.
|
| i think this default sucks.
You have the right to that opinion, but since it's Md's package, he
gets to choose. (Unless he's overridden, but let's not go down that
path.)
| wishlist bug would be better. then he has the possibility to mark
| as wontfix.
wontfix wishlist bugs will just be clutter in the BTS and the
maintainer is free to close such.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: