Re: Obfuscated source
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:43:40PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The SC is not a legal document. Common sense should suffice to conclude
> > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG.
> While I tend to agree, this has the unfortunate side-effect of removing
> any form of support for Nvidia graphics cards.
No source is no source; obfuscated code is not source. I hope we can agree
that crippling DFSG#2 in order to squeeze non-free nVidia code into main is
not a good thing to do.