[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Obfuscated source

On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 11:43:40PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The SC is not a legal document.  Common sense should suffice to conclude
> > that obfuscated source does not comply with the DFSG.
> While I tend to agree, this has the unfortunate side-effect of removing
> any form of support for Nvidia graphics cards.

No source is no source; obfuscated code is not source.  I hope we can agree
that crippling DFSG#2 in order to squeeze non-free nVidia code into main is
not a good thing to do.

Glenn Maynard

Reply to: