Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 01:24:32PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Saturday 11 December 2004 01:13, Rich Walker wrote:
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Rich Walker <email@example.com> writes:
> >  Non-US exists because export of strong crypto from the US is an
> > illegal act in the US. Hence, Debian has already accepted that
> > local laws trump idealism.
> actually non-us is a good example of letting packages into Debian despite it
> being illegal in certain areas.
Not really. The rest of the explanation for non-US is that those
packages weren't illegal to USE in the USA, but were illegal to
EXPORT. We don't have a section for packages that you aren't
allowed to have, or aren't allowed to use.
I'm all for omitting hot-babe just because it's more cruft.
How many CPU monitors can we possibly use? I'm not too concerned
about where it's legal for adults to use it.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>