Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Rich Walker <rw@shadow.org.uk> writes:

> Though you could try the following set of criteria:

We could have all kinds of criteria.  The ones you propose are not, in
fact, our criteria.  Our criteria are something like:

1. Does the license meet the DFSG?
2. Is there a Debian maintainer willing to maintain or sponsor the
   package?

Now, you might want a different set of criteria, in which case, please
suggest them in the proper forum, which is not here.

My concern is that Saudi Arabia and China don't get to tell us what
our criteria are, and I would oppose any criterion that amounts to
"give China a veto".  Your proposal allows China a veto in some cases,
and this makes it unreasonable to me.

It is outrageous to think that China's or Saudia Arabia's censorship
regimes should somehow influence our decision making in the slightest.

Thomas