On Dec 09, Ian Murdock <imurdock@progeny.com> wrote: > > > Let me first say unequivocally that the LCC is very interested in > > > getting Debian involved. The question has always been: How do we do > > > that? > > As usual: by sending patches. > So, the flow can only be unidirectional? No, interested developers can subscribe to the mailing list or whatever they need to do to partecipate. It's not that I don't like the idea of cooperation in defining things like sonames or some programs having an upstream maintainer instead of being independently patched to death by each distribution (especially for mature or orphaned packages like ppp, tcp-wrappers, netkit, etc...), but I'm can't see any benefit in blindly commiting to some standard, as it may mean lowering the quality of Debian. > > And which I doubt we will get with LCC, since the kernel is the most > > important piece which needs to be certificated. > The common core will include a common kernel. See the FAQ at Christoph Hellwig already explained the obvious problem with this. -- ciao, | Marco | [9687 apucCy4LNj8KQ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature