[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor



On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 19:57 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2004 07:42, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> 
> wrote:
> > > > Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered
> > > > to be appealing to prurient interests.  Unless, *maybe*, a hyper-
> > > > horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and
> > > > not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book.
> > > > Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash
> > > > his hand and stop being a pervert.
> > >
> > > So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then?
> >
> > How does "a picture of dogs copulating" get morphed into "bestiality"?
> 
> When such pictures appear on porn sites they are presumably used in the same 
> manner as other porn (not for scientific or artistic purposes).
[snip]
> 
> > Are you are purposefully misinterpreting what I wrote?
> 
> When you give an example of a boy needing to "wash his hands" after "seeing a 
> picture of dogs copulating" you are obviously referring to dog-copulation 
> porn pictures.  I was interpreting it in EXACTLY the same way as you.

But still, "a picture of dogs copulating" is *not* "bestiality",
and I never inferred that the picture would be on a porn site 
(there's more to life than than the internet, after all), so I'm
confused as to made the leap.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"If you wish for peace be ready for war."
Proverb
"To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of
preserving peace."
George Washington

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: