[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:22, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:01 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > So are you saying I should take my web pages of my naked dogs down?
> Depends on who's prurient interests are appealed to by your naked
> dogs.
> Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered
> to be appealing to prurient interests.  Unless, *maybe*, a hyper-
> horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and
> not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book.
> Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash
> his hand and stop being a pervert.

So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then?

Some years ago a server in Amsterdam that I was running was overloaded due to 
thousands of downloads per hour of a bestiality AVI.  I removed the site due 
to technical reasons (the entire ISP ran slow because of all the bestiality 

The same server had the same problem with pictures of Britney Spears, should I 
have removed the Britney pictures because they were obscene (no prises for 
guessing what they were used for) but left the animal sex pictures?

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: