[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 20:31 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:22, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:01 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > > So are you saying I should take my web pages of my naked dogs down?
> >
> > Depends on who's prurient interests are appealed to by your naked
> > dogs.
> >
> > Fortunately, though, pictures of naked dogs are *not* considered
> > to be appealing to prurient interests.  Unless, *maybe*, a hyper-
> > horny 13 year old boy is seeing a picture of dogs copulating, and
> > not in the context of some "scientific value", i.e., a text book.
> > Even in that case, though, the boy would probably be told to wash
> > his hand and stop being a pervert.
> So you have no objections to bestiality web sites then?

How does "a picture of dogs copulating" get morphed into "bestiality"?

Are you are purposefully misinterpreting what I wrote?


Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"Fear the Penguin!!"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: