Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:48:47 -0600, Ron Johnson <email@example.com> said:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:27 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:49:08 -0500, William Ballard
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:28:14PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> >> might want, and put it on non-us since it is illegal to
>> >> distribute such things in the USA (and unlike the possibility of
>> >> offending people's sensibilities, THIS is a real issue as things
>> >> stand). While at it, we
>> > They have had quite a few major busts of child pornographers in
>> > Europe and also Asia. Europe doesn't tolerate *everything*.
>> Kinda irrelevant. I don't see them shutting down the Louvre.
> Because the paintings/statues in the Louvre are considered "bona
> fide works of art, having serious literary, artistic, educational or
> scientific value."
And Bruno Bellamy paintings are so very obviously not art, eh?
And you are who, the culture police?
Computers can figure out all kinds of problems, except the things in
the world that just don't add up.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C