On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:39 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:32:29 -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> said: > > > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 19:24 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes: > >> > >> > There's a *fundamental* difference between "don't want hot-babe > >> > in Debian" and "don't want hot-babe to *exist*". > >> > >> Currently, the procedures for the inclusion of packages in Debian > >> allow each developer to decide what to package, provided the > >> licenses permit distribution. > > > Yes, I know. AFAICT, the only way for h-b to not be in Debian would > > be if Thibaut VARENE, who filed the original ITP, decided not to > > submit the package to Debian. > > That shall not work, since if the ITP is not followed upon, > other people may chose to put the package in Debian. ITP's can be > hijacked if the original author does not follow through. Picky, picky. You get my point, though. But probably not. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "One sword keeps another in the sheath." George Herbert
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part