On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 15:07 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:45:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > > On 05-Dec-04, 04:55 (CST), James Foster <jamesfoster@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > There's no excuse for censorship, ever. > > > > > > > Okay everybody, repeat after me: Choosing not to distribute a given > > package is NOT censorship. > > And telling somebody else that they can't distribute a given package > IS censorship. > > You evidently have chosen not to do it. That's not censorship. You're > presumably also trying to tell somebody else not to do it. That's > censorship. Then the DFSG is censorship, and newspaper editors are censors. Be real, man. Steve Greenland said it perfectly: "Choosing not to distribute a given package is NOT censorship. ... This is not a subtle difference." Besides, there are ways to put hot-babe in main, without running afoul of various laws: region-specific jigdo files. Net installer ISOs fulfill the same goal. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. NAMBLA - Nat'l Assoc of Marlon Brando Look-Alikes (Yes, it's a South Park reference.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part