Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 20:50:25 -0600, Ron Johnson <email@example.com> said:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 15:07 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:45:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> > On 05-Dec-04, 04:55 (CST), James Foster <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > There's no excuse for censorship, ever.
>> > >
>> > Okay everybody, repeat after me: Choosing not to distribute a
>> > given package is NOT censorship.
>> And telling somebody else that they can't distribute a given
>> package IS censorship.
>> You evidently have chosen not to do it. That's not
>> censorship. You're presumably also trying to tell somebody else not
>> to do it. That's censorship.
> Then the DFSG is censorship, and newspaper editors are censors.
> Be real, man. Steve Greenland said it perfectly: "Choosing not to
> distribute a given package is NOT censorship. ... This is not a
> subtle difference."
You choose not to put such a thing in Debian, your choice. You
tell me that something I have worked upon, is legal, and free, and my
work can't be put into debian because of your narrow morality, then
it is indeed censorship.
What kind of sordid business are you on now? I mean, man, whither
goest thou? Whither goest thou, America, in thy shiny car in the
night? -- Jack Kerouac
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C