Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:45:20 -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> said:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:36 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:13:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
>> > No. "We" are not calling on the Morality Police to take the
>> > particular web site down. "We" are not saying, "you can not
>> > install that app on your computer".
>> >
>> > There's a *fundamental* difference between "don't want hot-babe
>> > in Debian" and "don't want hot-babe to *exist*".
>>
>> That doesn't contradict the fact that this could be considered
>> stupid and/or hypocritic, while *not* censorship.
> True. Censorship and stupidity/hypocrisy are orthogonal.
You have got to be kidding. Or you do not understand the
meaning of the word orthogonal.
manoj
--
He'll sit here and he'll say, "Do this! Do that!" And nothing will
happen. Harry S. Truman, on presidential power
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: