Re: OT: appealing to the puritan interest [was Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor]
> It's "prurient", not "puritan".
>
> "dict prurient" will explain.
Thank you for misinterpreting the wordplay.
Please take this discussion to another mailing list or end it
completely. These arguments have been rehashed within Debian
since what I believe to be its original inception 7 years ago,
when a bunch of concerned and open-minded people tried to block
inclusion of the purity package. Rather than lose the purity
package, we lost some of those people instead.
Reply to: