Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:26:26PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Nobody objects to the CPU monitor itself. The objection lies with
> > the included image, not with the code. Remove that image and I
> > don't think there'd be any complaint.
> If the program works well, and depicts cpu usage, then the the
> image can change the aesthetics, not the utility. In my eyes, you
> have just blown all arguments of uselessness to smithereens.
No, it appears you have just supported it. If you contend that the
image has no impact on the utility, then let us just replace the image
and be done with it.
Or do you claim that aesthetics has no utliity?