Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:21:03AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Indeed, and this is also why Manoj's vi/KDE argument is not
> > relevant.
> > vi serves a useful purpose for an operating system.
> > Porn/nudes/whatever don't.
> A CPU monitor does. How the load is displayed, line graph,
> dancing bars, color changes, morphing pictures, is a preference
Nobody objects to the CPU monitor itself. The objection lies with the
included image, not with the code. Remove that image and I don't think
there'd be any complaint.