[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:21:03AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Indeed, and this is also why Manoj's vi/KDE argument is not
> > relevant.
> > vi serves a useful purpose for an operating system.
> > Porn/nudes/whatever don't.
> 	A CPU monitor does. How the load is displayed, line graph,
>  dancing bars, color changes, morphing pictures, is a preference
>  issue.

Red herring.

Nobody objects to the CPU monitor itself.  The objection lies with the
included image, not with the code.  Remove that image and I don't think
there'd be any complaint.

-- John

Reply to: