Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:19:48PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:06:18 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:30:24PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> >> It's VERY oppressive to force hot-babe out of Debian because of
> >> personal feelings about nudity. It's pure anti-speech insanity
> >> leading the way to socialism.
> > How about we leave it out because it's crap, then?
> From all accounts, it seems to be a well done piece of
> software -- just its choice of images is an issue.
Really? To me it seems trivial and almost useless.
Why bother linking the images with the system load? Just
set up an applet to display porn and get on with it.
> > Why stop at cartoons? Once it's themable, we should ship some
> > photographs too. And don't worry about the load monitoring, let's
> > just ship some porn for the sake of it. Call it test data for
> > pornview or something.
> Hmm. I would like some Raphael budes, yes. and some studies by
> michelangelo too. Oh, you think that is not porn?
I think calling the hot-babe package and images 'art' is a bit
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>