[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:30 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:34:06 -0600, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> said: 
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:53:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:32:18 +0000, Will Newton
> >> <will@misconception.org.uk> said: And we have no time to set up i
> >> judgement over content -- there is a clear criteria for inclusion
> >> of packages in Debian already.
> > If not, then your arguments about it being impossible to set a line
> > are moot.
> 	Rubbish. We set the line at illegal content, and by that
>  criteria, this is not illegal to distribute, and hence hot-babe is
>  in.

Yes, it is.


"lewd exhibition of the genitals"

> 	Have you any proof the content is illegal to distribute?
>  Seems like it has been up and around for a while.  Indeed, material
>  even worse than that is present on web sitres situated in the
>  US. Seems to me that this is mere FUD, trying to prevent expression
>  of artistry you are offended by.

See above.

Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"Don't tell me peace has broken out."
Bertolt Brecht

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: