On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:30 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:34:06 -0600, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> said: > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:53:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:32:18 +0000, Will Newton > >> <will@misconception.org.uk> said: And we have no time to set up i > >> judgement over content -- there is a clear criteria for inclusion > >> of packages in Debian already. > [snip] > > If not, then your arguments about it being impossible to set a line > > are moot. > > Rubbish. We set the line at illegal content, and by that > criteria, this is not illegal to distribute, and hence hot-babe is > in. Yes, it is. http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/o002.htm http://www.moralityinmedia.org/index.htm?obscenityEnforcement/obscporn.htm "lewd exhibition of the genitals" [snip] > > Have you any proof the content is illegal to distribute? > Seems like it has been up and around for a while. Indeed, material > even worse than that is present on web sitres situated in the > US. Seems to me that this is mere FUD, trying to prevent expression > of artistry you are offended by. See above. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Don't tell me peace has broken out." Bertolt Brecht
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part