[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:17:19 +0000, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> said: 

> Rather than argue about morality, legality, whatever, shouldn't we
> be considering this in other terms - simple usefulness? Instead of
> asking "why shouldn't this go into Debian?", ask "why _should_ this
> go into Debian?".

   Great idea. I find cpu monitors useful. I find vi useless.

> We seem to have a growing and worrying trend to pick up any random
> free software and add it to the distribution without considering
> whether it's actually useful or not...

	Yeah, should have nipped the whole vi clone family in the bud.

 happy to demonstrate that preferences are a bad way to form an
 inclusion policy
It's not whether you win or lose but how you played the
game. Grantland Rice
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: