On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:23:43PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:51:55PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > > I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really didn't > > intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please keep in mind, > > that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn woman? > > The problem with pornography in the US is that it isn't defined. It's > officially "I'll know it when I see it." Tread carefully. > > - David Nusinow > There is a case being defended by the EFF about a web site featuring a professional fotographer who takes erotic photos. The test is 'local community standards'. There are none for the i-net. And anywheres cd are distrubued, each community has their own local standards. SO how can the cd pass every community tests if we dont have access to all those laws/standards/communities. -Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
Description: Digital signature