Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:45:27 -0600, Ron Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:30 +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
>> El Miércoles 01 Diciembre 2004 04:22, Simon Law escribió:
>> > > But we don't care about legal problems until somebody is coming
>> > > to complain to us. That's how Debian is working till the
>> > > moment. Otherwise it should be impossible to release any
>> > > software (because software patents, for example).
>> > I believe people are complaining _right_ _now_.
>> I meant: when some external people is expressing some legal
>> concerns to Debian in this subject. Like the software patents
>> situations. ASAP, we don't remove patented sofware if we don't know
>> that there will be problems with that patent.
>> I think the point here is that some developers have some moral
>> concerns with this program, and they are trying to find some legal
>> arguments to avoid this program entering in Debian.
> *No*, that's *not* true. The thought (well mine, at least) is, "not
> in main, not on Disk 1".
When you say not in main, it means not in debian.
> Let them do "# apt-get install hot-babe bible-kjv" and all will be
I am not sure we should cater to the repression of freedoms in
parochial laws, cause well, you can find a lot of stupid laws in
different parts of the world.
Of course there's no reason for it, it's just our policy.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C