[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> schrieb:
> > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> >
> >> That still doesn't convert the opinion of most frequent writers on
> >> debian-legal that the GFDL doesn't meet the SC into a decision to remove
> >> all packages with GFDL from Debian.
> >
> > Huh?  We *already* have a requirement that packages which don't meet
> > our licensing criteria should be removed.  
> We've had a GR whose result is, among other things, that for the sarge
> release we decided *not* to remove those packages (or documents). 

Yes, that's right, I don't disagree at all.

But what happens after sarge is equally clear: packages with GFDL
material must have the GFDL material removed.

Reply to: