Re: spamassassin3 - is memory usage ok now?
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had increased
> ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they fixed now
> with the new release that appeared in unstable?
I recently decided to try SA3, even though its alleged performance
problem, and with -m 2, it seems to run fine on my 96MB machine up to
Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | email@example.com
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Software Patents: Where do you want to stifle inovation today?