Re: Documentation on handling of orig.tar.gz files for Developer's Reference or for Debian Policy
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 12:45:36 -0800, Chris Waters <email@example.com> said:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:47:02PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:39:44 -0800, Chris Waters <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > I'm not at all sure how this rule would apply, for example, to my
>> > own pilot-manager_1.107.0pre108.orig.tar.gz. Everything in there
>> > is from upstream's website, except my own note on how I put the
>> > pieces together. Do I need to remove that note?
>> I think so, yes.
> So in other words, I'm to be punished for my negligent maintaining
Oh, _do_ grow up.
> of the upstream website? And all I need to do to satisfy your silly
> complaint is to scp my note to the website somewhere? Do I need to
> provide a link anywhere? How about if I simply add a link on the
> upstream website to the tarball on Debian's servers?
You may throw how ever many childish tenmper tantrums you
want, or exercise your 'leet abilities to "Look! I can change
upstream to match whatever I ship! Anytime! Mua hah ahhaha", but the
simple fact remains: what you are shipping as orig.tar.gz does not
match what people can download from the upstream site, and it is
deviating from the recommendation that we ship pristine upstream as
far as legally possible.
Please don't put a strain on our friendship by asking me to do
something for you.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C