On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 01:37:21AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> This is incorrect, t-p-u is indeed supported by buildds -- though > >> this paragraph seems to be more like a rant than anything else. > > Okay, it's a month old, but there hasn't been any since. > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/09/msg00005.html > > "We are also still missing official autobuilders for > > testing-proposed-updates on alpha and mips. All other architectures > > appear to be keeping up with t-p-u uploads." > Missing a buildd on an arch or too is a far cry from t-p-u > being unsupported. Unfortunately, nothing in t-p-u can be safely accepted into testing until it's been built for all relevant architectures. While having 9 out of 11 architectures building t-p-u is better than still needing all 11 archs to be set up for it, the practical, visible impact *today* on testing is the same; it just means that the "tomorrow" when we can use t-p-u for its intended purpose is likely a little closer. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature