Re: Drop testing
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > It may sound a bit radical, but core points have been mentioned in the
> > thread already. I suggest to do it in a more radical way:
> > - unstable lockdown in the freeze
> > - drop Testing and concentrate on work instead of wasting time on
> > synching stuff. This eliminates the need for testing-security. See
> > the last part of the paper for details.
> You _are_ aware that this is approximately how it was done before woody, no?
With three 1-month test cycles to get frozen into a reasonable and releaseable
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.