Re: about volatile.d.o/n
> I see no reason for new packages to ever go into volatile. Such things
> belong in backports.
Jesus Climent writes:
> You seem to have missed a very important ground of volatile: add new
> packages in a controled way when backporting code to the version in
> stable is far more difficult than guarantee a new version being stable
> enough to be updated.
New versions of packages already in Stable are not new packages. Clamav
1.0 would be a new version. BetterVirusGetter would be a new package.