Re: about volatile.d.o/n
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:22:15PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > To be fair, the issue is that if were just rules, there wouldn't
> > be a need.
>
> Why not? I pretty much want to have the spamfilter rules on my mail
> box updated from time to time. Currently that has lead me to put
> a low-pinned unstable in sources.list and get spamassassin from there.
> But it was not meant to suddenly pull in spamassassin3. If volatile
> had existed, I could have avoided that.
Read the thread. There are plenty of points you seems to be missing with your
statement.
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
London. You know... fish, chips, cup o' tea, bad food, worse weather,
Mary-fucking-Poppins... London!
--Avi (Snatch)
Reply to: