Re: TG3 firmware report...
* Thomas Bushnell:
> John Hasler <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> The intent implied by publically releasing a work under the GPL is well
>> understood and widely known. I don't believe that they would stand any
>> chance of getting an injunction, let alone damages.
> You cannot infer person A's intent in doing something merely by
> assuming that it must be the same as persons B, C, and D.
Well, of course you can. A lot of contracts are made this way (for
example, if you buy something in a shop).
Is U.S. law really *that* different?