Re: TG3 firmware report...
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> To me, this means that Broadcom didn't know what the hell it was doing.
> I cannot divine Broadcom's actual intentions from that, and Broadcom can
> easily and convincingly claim that it intended something different from
> what you assume.
The intent implied by publically releasing a work under the GPL is well
understood and widely known. I don't believe that they would stand any
chance of getting an injunction, let alone damages.
The fact that they have already permitted redistribution would count
heavily against them.