Re: about volatile.d.o/n
* John Hasler (firstname.lastname@example.org) [041011 19:55]:
> Andreas Barth writes:
> > I could however see the possiblity to add a new package "mozilla1.7",
> > that users can optionally install. However, I also won't like it.
> I see no reason for new packages to ever go into volatile. Such things
> belong in backports.
If we really say: "Well, we recommend to upgrade your package to the
newest version.", _than_ I think adding it to volatile may be ok.
However, certainly a border case, and certainly not the most important
thing to start off (so, IMHO, we can just postpone the discussion about,
and start with the things we all agree about).
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C