Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:37:42PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Now it's running at -m5 (the suggested value) and I have not had
> problems since. Of course, now I only get half the throughput, and
> my queue has not emptied for a whole day because SA is unable to
> keep up.
>
I had -m2 and each child canibalized up 20M of VM in just a few minutes.
With 128M that makes difference. I'm now quite happily using razor
with only very few false positives and a very high success rate in
filtering spam.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: