[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Updating scanners and filters in Debian stable (3.1)

On Oct 07, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:

> This policy is even not ok for a normal major debian upgrade. We have
> exim and exim4, we have inn and inn2 for exactly that reason, and we should
> also provide spamassassin and spamassassin3. This doesn't mean that
inn supports just about every feature not related to performance which
inn2 has, while it's not obvious at all that spamassassin 2.x is still
useful right now, and it will be probably not much useful in one year
time. This comparison is not really meaningful.

ciao, |
Marco | [8403 inZVh2DDlvmBI]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: