Re: If ATI and nVidia don't support their own products, who does?
Matthias Urlichs <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Hi, Brendan wrote:
>> Open Source is awesome, but most hardware companies are
>> never, ever going to open their hardware.
> There's a rather large difference between telling people how to talk to
> the hardware they buy (some interpretations of German law suggest that one
> *has* to do that; for instance, you're legally required here to provide
> schematics so that people can, theoretically these days, repair their VCRs
> if they break), and giving away the design files for the chips so that
> others can go to their own fab and recreate one (which is what "open
> hardware" ultimately means).
Yes, reminds one of the difference between publishing API specs and
publishing the whole source code.
Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | email@example.com
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
The best way to accelerate a Windows machine is at 9.81 m/s^2